job and literalism

February 28, 2009 at 2:29 pm 1 comment

imagesMy wife is reading Job. I asked her this morning if she read the book as allegory or as literal history. She replied that she did believe it to be literal history. She said it didn’t seem like something someone would make up. In other words, it didn’t seem likely to her that it would be made up.

Very interesting to me, because I would see it as allegory for exactly the opposite reason: it does not seem like something that is true history. The beginning of the story is comprised by fantastic events, God and Satan dialoging, and a series of seemingly impossible catastrophes descend upon Job. And the dialog is a perfect setup for the dialog between Job and his “counselors,” the counselors providing the perfect counterpoint to Job, and then God providing the perfect counterpoint to the counselors. It seems like a story set up by the author to convey his thoughts about God.

I have come to a conclusion through this conversation – that the reason my wife reads Job as history not allegory is that all her life it has been preached and taught to her as actual history. Sermons in our religious tradition speak as, “When all of Job’s children were killed…” not, “Where the story of Job in the bible teaches that…” So we proceed to read Job through that lens, accepting that they have correctly taught from the book. I viewed the bible in much the same way.

Something amazing but subtle occured during the conversation, we had a rational and calm talk about the bible. That’s been rare for us this year. I really believe that conversations like this are critical, much more so than any firm arguments or case I could bring up against the bible. They are the small building blocks of rational and critical thought in my wife’s life towards religion and the bible, and the building blocks of rational discussion between the two of us. As Bethlin commented on my last post: …I’m discovering that a good argument and a little support can go a long way toward making peace with the “other.”


Entry filed under: bible.

different angles patron saints of deconversion

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. The Rambling Taoist  |  February 28, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    That last sentence is a very good point — something that I need to learn to do much better!

    As to the rest of your post, conditioning (or brainwashing) is the methodology of any belief system, religious or otherwise. You start with people when they’re very young and you present the view of the world through a narrow lens. You drum into people’s heads certain terms and historical perspectives and, in time, they come to believe that the world is this particular way, it always has been and always will be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 20 other followers

Recent Posts

current and recent reads

not much

Russell Shorto: Descartes' Bones: A Skeletal History of the Conflict between Faith and Reason

to read:

I support

Kiva - loans that change lives


wordpress visitor

%d bloggers like this: